Jack's Copper Project

The Company’s 96% owned subsidiary Luangwa Minerals Limited has entered into an option agreement with Mwashia Resources Limited, a privately held Zambian registered company, to earn up to a 90% joint venture interest in Large Exploration Licence number 27069-HQ-LEL.


  • Agreement covers Exploration licence 27069-HQ-LEL (“Jack’s Licence”) and rights to enter into similar option agreements over four additional and separate licences on the same terms.
  • Jack’s Licence underlain by Lower Roan Group stratigraphy, the major copper mine host rocks in the Central African Copperbelt (>2 Mt contained copper).
  • Copper mineralisation reported in drill testing of an 18km long open-ended soil geochemical anomaly. Reported drill hole intersections include:
    • 14m at 1.04% copper from 113m depth in RC drill hole KJ14
    • 8m at 0.96% copper from 112m depth in diamond drillhole KJD1
    • 7m grading 1.56% copper from 322m depth in diamond drill hole KJD7

The Central African Copperbelt is the world’s largest sediment-hosted stratiform copper province. It includes at least 14 giant deposits within a 400-km arcuate trend of Neoproterozoic rocks that spans the border of Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

Exploration Licence 27069-HQ-LEL covers 141.4 sq. km. and is located 85km south of Luanshya in the Central African Copperbelt. The licence is underlain by rocks of the Lower Roan Group, the main copper mineralised rock sequence  in the Copperbelt.

The Company cautions that the record of exploration available to the Company is incomplete but indicate that the licence area was first explored by Roan Selection Trust Ltd. (“RST”) in the 1960s after copper flower was observed in the vicinity of Jack’s Hill.

RST drilled a series of diamond drill holes in the area of the copper showings which coincides with the nose of a fold structure. Several zones of low-grade copper were reportedly intersected but these holes have not yet been located.

The area was subject to further exploration in the 1990s by Caledonia Mining Corporation (“CMC”) who conducted aeromagnetic surveys and geochemical sampling (conventional and Mobile Metal Ion) which reportedly highlighted an intermittent geochemical anomaly extending for  over 18 kilometres. After delineation of prospective areas, CMC entered into a joint venture earn-in agreement with Cyprus AMAX Minerals (“Cyprus”), a major US-based mineral exploration and mining company.

The 1997 exploration programme included infill geochemical sampling, ground based magnetics and a 19-hole reverse circulation (RC) percussion drill programme.

A further programme of six diamond drill holes totalling 1,378 metres was completed in 1998 to test along strike and down dip extensions to the previously intersected mineralisation as well as the most anomalous soil geochemistry on both limbs and within the closure of the fold structure.

Highlights are presented in the following table:

True thicknesses are unknown.

Two separate zones of copper mineralised horizons are reported and the drilling results suggest significant depth potential for the mineralisation. Notably diamond hole KJD01 confirmed the upper zone mineralisation with an  intersection in RC hole KJ14 intersecting partly leached copper oxide and chalcocite at 112m depth whilst KJD7 collared “north” of KJD1 reportedly intersected the same mineralisation horizon at 322m depth within the chalcocite zone grading 1.56% copper over 7m. The lower zone mineralisation in each hole reportedly gave typical grades of around 0.5% to 0.7% copper.

Additional geochemical sampling and geophysical surveys were conducted in 1999 to further delineate the Jack’s Hill anomaly for further drilling. However, shortly after the joint-venture agreement was terminated following the acquisition of Cyprus by Phelps Dodge and the subsequent corporate restructure and the project area was subsequently relinquished by CMC.

Additional licences

The Additional Licences have all been selected by Mwashia based on geological prospectivity.

  1. Company’s proposed strategy, plans and objectives or to the expectations or intentions of the Company’s directors. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other important factors beyond the control of the Company that could cause the actual performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not rely on any forward-looking statements and save as required by the AIM Rules for Companies or by law, the Company does not accept any obligation to disseminate any updates or revisions to such forward-looking statements.